VS PitchBook
PitchBook is institutional-grade private market data with institutional-grade pricing: no public numbers, no self-serve, no free tier. FlareSight reads the same SEC Form D filings and surfaces 120,000+ funded US startups within hours of closing. Free to start.
Both use SEC filings as a data source. They serve different use cases, at very different price points. Here is where they differ on the dimensions that matter for sales and BD work.
PitchBook sources from SEC filings too, among many other inputs. FlareSight reads Form D directly and indexes within hours of acceptance. You get the same primary source, without the institutional pricing.
~90% of seed-stage raises receive no top-tier press. PitchBook's enrichment pipeline processes these more slowly because there is no press trigger. FlareSight indexes every Form D the day it lands, regardless of whether anyone writes about it.
PitchBook requires a pricing conversation before you can access anything. FlareSight has a free tier with no credit card required. Sign up, search, and see this week's funded companies without a sales call.
FlareSight is one option. Here is how it sits relative to other tools in the private markets data space.
Best for: Investors, analysts, and researchers tracking global funding and startup history.
Where they win: Broad global coverage, investor relationship graphs, acquisition tracking, and self-serve access at significantly lower cost than PitchBook.
vs. FlareSight: FlareSight indexes US funding events hours after filing. Crunchbase lags by days to weeks. For the ~90% of seed deals that get no top-tier press, Crunchbase misses them entirely. FlareSight does not.
Best for: VCs and investors who want to identify high-momentum companies before a round closes.
Where they win: Multi-signal approach catches company momentum before funding confirmation. Strong for pre-funding VC deal sourcing and thesis-driven discovery.
vs. FlareSight: FlareSight provides confirmed funding events from a legal filing. For sales use cases where you need to know a round closed rather than predict it might close, Form D is the more actionable trigger.
Best for: Corporate strategy teams, consulting firms, and enterprise innovation groups tracking market trends.
Where they win: Curated market reports, technology trend analysis, competitive landscapes, and analyst commentary across sectors.
vs. FlareSight: CB Insights is priced for enterprise strategy work, not individual prospecting. FlareSight is accessible without an enterprise contract and delivers a fresh US funding signal faster than any curated research pipeline.
Best for: Institutional investors, LPs, and fund managers tracking alternative asset performance and commitments.
Where they win: Deep LP-level data, fund performance benchmarks, and commitment tracking across institutional asset classes. The reference tool for LP due diligence.
vs. FlareSight: Preqin is built for institutional fund analysis, not company-level discovery. FlareSight covers the company side: which startups just raised, what they raised, and who led the deal, available immediately without an enterprise contract.
Best for: Investment banks, asset managers, and large financial institutions needing broad market data and analytics.
Where they win: Massive breadth across public equity, fixed income, FX, commodities, and private markets. Deep integration into trading and research workflows.
vs. FlareSight: Refinitiv is an institutional infrastructure product priced accordingly. FlareSight solves a narrow problem well: US startup funding discovery at hours-level latency, accessible without a Bloomberg-scale contract.
Private market data tools differ on depth, freshness, and cost. Seven criteria to check before committing.
Related: SEC Form D database | Startup funding database | Crunchbase alternative
Three specific workflows. What you search, what you get, and what changes relative to PitchBook.
Task: Tracking which software companies in a specific sector raised venture rounds in the last quarter, as context for an M&A pitch.
On FlareSight
Search by sector keyword. Filter by round size and date range. Export the list of Form D filings from the quarter. See investor names and round sizes. Have a comp set in minutes without a database that costs more than the analyst's monthly salary.
On PitchBook
Better for the full deal term picture: valuation, deal structure, lead and follow investors, and cap table context. If the pitch deck needs institutional-grade comp analysis, PitchBook has depth FlareSight does not match.
Task: Identifying software companies that recently raised a Series A or B in a portfolio company's adjacent market, as potential add-on acquisition candidates.
On FlareSight
Filter by sector and round size. Pull last 90 days of Form D filings. Identify which companies received capital and who invested. Have a qualified initial list to share with the deal team before the first internal review.
On PitchBook
Stronger for the diligence phase: valuation benchmarks, management team history, fund round-by-round data, and cap table structure. FlareSight surfaces the initial candidate list faster; PitchBook supports the deeper analysis.
Task: Building a monthly report on funding activity in the company's competitive landscape: which startups raised, how much, and from whom.
On FlareSight
Search by competitor keywords and sector. Set a monthly date filter. Pull Form D filings. See investor names. Know which VC funds are actively backing the competition and which companies just received runway for aggressive product development.
On PitchBook
More complete for global competitive tracking and for deals that did not file Form D (international rounds, PE-backed deals). FlareSight covers US venture specifically and does it faster. For a US-focused competitive landscape, FlareSight is the faster and more affordable data source.
Free to start
Start for free. No credit card.
See who just raisedFree plan available forever. No credit card required.